Titus v. City of Montesano
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Grays Harbor county, Chapman, J., entered July 16, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort, after a trial on the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The respondent was injured by a fall upon the sidewalk of the appellant city. Within thirty days after receiving the.injury, she prepared and filed with the city clerk a written claim for damages. No action having been taken thereon by the city council within sixty days following the presentation of the claim, the respondent brought-the present action to recover for the damages suffered. After the service of the summons and complaint upon the city, it appeared through its attorney, and moved the court to require the complaint to be made more definite and certain by setting forth therein…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Born v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Nicol v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Durham v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Lilly v. Town of WoodstockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Sullivan v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Duschaine v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Sprague v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Colquhon v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Finn v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Cook v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.