Legal Opinion

Sopchak v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1937No. 26262. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This is an action sounding in tort brought against a city of the first class. The sole question presented on appeal is whether or not the claim filed by the appellant, as a condition precedent to bringing the action, complies with Rem. Rev. Stat., §§9478-9480 [P. C. §§703-704a], and §133 of the' charter of the city of Tacoma.

Section 9478 [P. C. § 703] requires claims sounding in tort against cities of the first class to be filed with the city clerk, in compliance with the charter provisions of such city, and to contain, “in addition to the valid requirements of such city charter relating…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eastwood v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Caron v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Nelson v. DunkinWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Duschaine v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Brigham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Cook v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API