Legal Opinion

Lowry v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1999No. CV-98-0480-PRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Justice.

I

¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether, for purposes of determining workers’ compensation disability benefits, an employee’s average monthly wage includes earnings from concurrent employment held within the thirty days prior to, but not on the date of, an on-the-job injury.

¶2 During 1992, petitioner Carl Lowry worked for the City of Coolidge as a building inspector and also as a volunteer firefighter. His pay as a firefighter consisted of approximately one-tenth his wages as a building inspector. The City terminated the building inspector position, and Lowry’s employment…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Brannigan v. RaybuckArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. BerryArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Dietz v. General Electric Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of WyttenbachCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Julie Munoz v. Sonic Restaurants 10 and Hartford Accident & indemnity/gallagher BassettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Morse v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Wozniak v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. Berryhill v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API