Legal Opinion

Pettis v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1962No. 7424PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, Justice.

Petitioner, James A. Pettis, sustained an injury to his back in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with Henning & Turnbull on May 11, 1959. Thereafter, on January 17, 1961, the Industrial Commission of Arizona, hereinafter called “Commission”, entered its findings and award which included the finding “That the average monthly wage of applicant prior to injury was the sum 'of $428.11” and the finding “That applicant has sustained a 15% general physical functional disability as the result of said accident.” Petitioner duly filed a petition for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steward v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hiestand v. RistauNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hartley v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Pryor v. BrickleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1939

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Waller v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Moorehead v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Powell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Pena v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API