Swift Transportation v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATTERSON, Presiding Judge.
The sole issue raised in this special action review of an Industrial Commission award is whether the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) abused his discretion in determining the claimant’s average monthly wage.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 26, 1991, the respondent-employee (“claimant”) was hired by the petitioner-employer, Swift Transportation, as a truck driver, and he was placed in a probationary-training status. While in training, he received a weekly salary of $250. When the training period concluded, the claimant was paid twenty cents per mile…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nydam v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Fowler v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Harvey Auto Supply Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Davis v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kessen v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Lowry v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Julie Munoz v. Sonic Restaurants 10 and Hartford Accident & indemnity/gallagher BassettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Morse v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Berryhill v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.