Ex Parte Luening
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a writ of habeas corpus to the sheriff of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Application for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was charged in a sworn complaint, filed with a justice of the peace of San Bernardino county, “as a person found in a public place with a loaded revolver, a deadly weapon, concealed upon his person, in violation of County Ordinance No. 102.” To such charge he entered a plea of guilty, and judgment followed. Under a commitment issued out of said judgment he is held in custody. Ordinance No. 102 was adopted by the board of supervisors of San Bernardino county prior to the arrest of the petitioner, and is as follows: “Section 1. Any person…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Tulare v. HevrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ex parte DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ex parte CheneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Watson v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Lewiston v. FraryIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Ex Parte HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Hood v. MelroseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.