Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1918No. Crim. No. 713PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

The defendant was charged with the violation of section 3 of chapter 145 of the Statutes of 1917. The information also charged him with a prior conviction of grand larceny. Upon his arraignment the defendant pleaded guilty of the crime charged, and admitted the prior conviction. The indeterminate sentence provided by law was thereupon imposed, directing that the defendant be taken and confined in the state prison at San Quentin for a period not to exceed five years.

This is an appeal from the judgment in which the only question raised is as to the constitutionality of the section of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Ex parte CheneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ex Parte LueningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. CamperlingoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. People v. McCloskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. MesceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. CannizzaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API