Watson v. Whitney
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court of Napa County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.
This is an action for forcible entry and detainer. The facts are substantially as follows: The tract of land in controversy was inclosed at the time of the forcible entry, which took place December 31st, 1862, and had been in the quiet and peaceable possession of the plaintiff or his tenants ever since 1856. On that day, Watson, the plaintiff, and several persons with him, went to the place where the defendant, with six or seven others, was engaged in constructing a small house. The plaintiff asked whose house is that, to which the defendant replied that it was his; and the plaintiff then…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O'Callaghan v. Booth & DealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Sloan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by14 opinions
- Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. PomeroyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. BuyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Donovan v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. Car SoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.