Legal Opinion

Hood v. Melrose

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1914No. Civ. No. 1498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Review to be directed to the Recorder of the City of Tropico. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In response to a writ of certiorari issued by this court and directed to respondent as recorder of the city .of Tropico, the proceedings had and taken in the recorder’s court presided over by respondent in a certain action wherein petitioner was convicted of the violation of a city ordinance, have been transmitted to this court for review.

The city of Tropico is a municipal corporation of the sixth class, empowered, among other things, (1) “to pass ordinances not in conflict with the constitution and laws of this state, or of the United States”; (16) “to establish and maintain fire limits and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mill v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Sawyer v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. In re FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AmdurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Sears v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. People v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Maidenberg v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. People v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API