Legal Opinion
Lederer v. Rankin
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
Decided December 3, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On Motion to Set Aside Service of Summons.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
A motion was filed in this case on behalf of the defendants to set aside the service of the summons because the defendants are not, and never have been, residents, inhabitants, or citizens of this district. The motion is resisted by the complainant upon two grounds:
1. Decuuse by the act of congress of January 6, 1897, amendatory of section 49(5(5 of the Revised Statutes, jurisdiction is given, as it is claimed, to any circuit court to grant injunctions in such cases, without reference to the residence of the defendant, — whether in or out of the district in which suit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Southern Pac. Co. v. EarlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Van Patten v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lewis Blind Stitch Co. v. Arbetter Felling Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
- Harding v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1909
- Spears v. FlynnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1900