Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. Co. v. Earl

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1897No. 325PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Uuited States for the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

Appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction. The suit was brought by Edwin T. Earl against the defendants for the purpose of restraining the infringement of reissued letters patent No. 11,324, granted to him April 18, 1893, for an inyention entitled, “Ventilator and Combined Ventilator and Refrigerator Oar.” The bill of complaint is verified, and alleges, among other things, a prior judgment of the circuit court for the Northern district of California, in which the appellee herein was plaintiff, and Robert Graham, one of the appellants, was defendant, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Whitten v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme PasteurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
  5. Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bowers v. Atlantic, G. & P. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
  2. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Pacific Coast Lumber Mfrs.' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  3. Kings County Raisin & Fruit Co. v. United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  4. Chew v. First Presbyterian Church of Wilmington, Del., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1916
  5. Harriman v. Northern Securities Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API