Legal Opinion

Spears v. Flynn

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan

Decided May 10, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

WAKTY, District Judge.

A bill was filed in this cause by the complainants, none of whom are residents of this district, against several nonresident defendants and one resident defendant, for infringement of a copyright. Service of process was had upon all of the defendants within this jurisdiction, and the-nonresident defendants now move to dismiss the cause as to them because the act of 3d March, 1887, as corrected by the act of 13th August, 1888, provides that “no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against any person by any original process or proceeding in any other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Donnelly v. United States Cordage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1895
  4. Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Hall Signal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
  5. Lederer v. RankinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Lewis Blind Stitch Co. v. Arbetter Felling Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
  3. Pennsylvania R. v. Anoka Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API