In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
This was a petition for a writ of mandamus to the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, to command them to take jurisdiction and proceed against the E. L. Patch Company upon á bill in equity, filed in that court on January 26, 1895, by the petitioner, described in the bill as a corporation organized ancl existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, against the E. L. Patch Company, alleged in the bill to be a…
Read the full summary
This was a petition for a writ of mandamus to the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, to command them to take jurisdiction and proceed against the E. L. Patch Company upon á bill in equity, filed in that court on January 26, 1895, by the petitioner, described in the bill as a corporation organized ancl existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, against the E. L. Patch Company, alleged in the bill to be a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Massachusetts, and having its principal office and place of…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
This case presents a single question of jurisdiction pf the Circuit Court of the United States, and involves no consideration of the merits of the cause of action asserted in the bill filed in that court.
By the act of March 3,1881, c. 138, “ owners of trade-marks used in commerce with foreign nations, or with the Indian tribes, provided such owners shall be domiciled in the United States, or located in any foreign country or tribe which by treaty, convention or law affords similar privileges to citizens of the United States, may obtain registration of such trade-' marks,” by causing to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Jerry Wayne Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. And Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.