Legal Opinion

United States v. Martinsmith

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 27, 1993No. ACMR 9200946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of conspiracy to commit larceny of $38,000.00, desertion terminated by apprehension, failure to repair, failure to obey a lawful general regulation, and fourteen specifications of larceny, in violation of Articles 81, 85, 86, 92, and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 885, 886, 892, and 921 (1982). He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for fifteen years, total…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. RosatoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. LampaniUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinsmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. CzekalaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. BlackmonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. HallU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. United States v. GavittU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API