Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 14, 1994No. ACMR 9202024PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*592OPINION OF THE COURT

CREAN, Senior Judge:

Contrary to her pleas, the appellant was found guilty, by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, of making and submitting a false claim in violation of Article 132, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 932 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ], The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of confinement for two years.

The appellant contends that she is entitled to a new staff judge advocate recommendation. Her allegation relies on a recent opinion of this court holding that a recommendation of the staff judge advocate pursuant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. MartinsmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. GavittU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HensleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. HensleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API