Michael Joseph Paradiso and Anthony Richard Bonnacci v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT.
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This case raises recurring and important problems of what procedure constitutes compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and what circumstances justify the withdrawal of a guilty plea under federal rules and Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1972).
Appellants Paradiso and Bonnacci were indicted on April 16, 1969, along with several others, by a federal grand jury sitting in New Jersey, on a four count indictment charging conspiracy to possess stolen goods and possession of goods stolen from interstate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Raymond S. Berry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- John E. Kress v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip CimminoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Brainard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- United States v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jose Javier Fernandez and Jorge Cole, Appeal of Jose Javier FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Richard Henry Bryan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.