Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2001No. 20000337PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Daniel Miller appealed from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition. We affirm, concluding (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion or violate Miller’s right to present a defense when it excluded evidence and (2) a minor reconfiguration of the courtroom to accommodate the child victim’s testimony was not obvious error.

I

[¶ 2] Between December 1998 and March 1999, Miller lived with his sister R.A. (“Rhonda,” a pseudonym) and her family in their home on the Grand Forks Air Force Base. Miller then moved out of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. ParisienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. KrullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HirschkornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API