Powell v. Leicester Mills Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, District Judge.
This case concerns automatic straight knitting machines. In the court below John G. Powell and Edward Powell charged infringement of the two claims of patent FTo. 510,934, granted to them December-19, 1893, for a web-holder actuating device for such machine. That court, finding there Avas no infringement, dismissed the bill. Its action in so doing is •here assigned for error.
*387The operative parts of a straight knitting machine are rows of opposing needles, which carry the yarn through successively formed loops; accompanying web sinkers, which hold down the fabric, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Masseth v. PalmU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- William R. Thropp & Sons Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- Johns-Manville Corporation v. National Tank Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. William R. Thropp & Sons Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
- Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Burdett-Rowntree Mfg. Co. v. Standard Plunger Elevator Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.