Legal Opinion
Demos v. City of Indianapolis
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided December 29, 2000No. IP 99-022-C-B/SPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARKER, Chief Judge.
Five employees and former employees of the City of Indianapolis (“the City”) sued the City and Bart Peterson, Mayor of the City of Indianapolis, for overtime compensation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207, et seq. Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and supporting documents arguing that Plaintiffs were exempt administrative and/or executive employees as defined by 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(1). Extensive briefing followed. For the reasons set fort below,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- John T. Russell v. Acme-Evans Company, Adm Milling Company, and Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smidt v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Alan L. Demos and Ronald Graham v. City of Indianapolis and Bart Peterson, Mayor of the City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Demos v. City of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Kennedy v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2003
- Nickell v. City of Lawrence, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.