Legal Opinion
Nickell v. City of Lawrence, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 23, 2004No. 03-4070-KGSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEBELIUS, United states Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Defendant City of Lawrence’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 52). Plaintiffs, police sergeants in the City of Lawrence Police Department (“LKPD”), brought this suit claiming they were wrongfully denied overtime pay in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). 1 Defendant claims Plaintiffs are exempt executive and administrative employees under 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(1) and are thus not entitled to overtime pay. 2 Having carefully considered the parties’ evidentiary submissions,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation and Paul M. McCollisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Adams v. America Guarantee & Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rooney v. Town of GrotonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Mullins v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Turnley v. Town of VernonVermont Superior Court · 2011