McLaughlin v. Dopps
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Benton county, Kauffman, J., entered November £9, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a promissory note.
1Opinion of the Court
Main, J.-
-The purpose of this action was to recover on a promissory note. The note was signed by nine individuals and one firm name. Summons was served upon all the makers of the note with the exception of three. Three general defenses were interposed on behalf of all of the defendants who were served with process: First, that the mailing of the note was induced by false and fraudulent representations; second, that there was a failure, or partial failure, of the consideration; and third, that the plaintiff was not a holder in due course. Three of the defendants who appeared interposed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richmond v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Keene v. BehanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Scandinavian American Bank v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Union Investment Co. v. RosenzweigWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Cedar Rapids National Bank v. Myhre Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Long v. McAvoyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Delaney v. BrownwoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- First National Bank v. DotsonWashington Supreme Court · 1924