State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentMoyer, C.J.
In reaching the result that it does, the majority ignores the rule of law established as precedent in this court. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
An action in mandamus will lie when a public agency is under a clear legal duty to perform an official act and there is no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph one of the syllabus. Thus, mandamus is appropriate when the Industrial Commission makes a decision on a request for an award of benefits for violation of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Board of Education v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Saunders v. Metal Container Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.