Legal Opinion
Thomas F. Rauschenberg v. William Williamson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 2, 1986No. 85-8366PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we are urged to reverse a district court holding that special factors counsel against allowing a former parolee to bring a Bivens action against his former parole officer for misrepresentations to the former parolee and for recommendations the parole officer made to the United States Parole Commission. We affirm.
Thomas F. Rauschenberg, the appellant, was convicted in 1975 of violating the Federal Controlled Substances Act and sentenced to a term of seven years imprisonment with three years special parole to follow the imprisonment. The United States…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Richard E. Dynes v. Army Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wilson v. RackmillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Daniel Engel v. Robert BuchanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Mirmehdi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Santiago Alvarez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Wilson v. RackmillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.