Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Rackmill
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 6, 1989No. 89-1062PublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Lawrence D. Wilson, appeals from the final order of the district court granting defendants Shelley Witenstein and Michael Santella’s motion to dismiss and denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order which dismissed as frivolous appellant’s claims against the remaining defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
I. FACTS
Appellant filed this civil rights action in the district court against various federal probation officers, two federal parole examiners and a regional commissioner of the United…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Harry Lawrence Williams, Sr. v. Gordon H. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Mark Mitchell v. Martin F. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Young v. QuinlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Kenneth McClure Young, II v. Warren Kann and Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Debro Siddig Abdul-Akbar v. Watson, Robert J. Darcy Watson Walter Redman Kay Jacobs U.S. District Court Delaware Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Roman v. JeffesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.