Legal Opinion
State v. Ewing
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1996No. 17416PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ACOBA Judge.
On August 11, 1993, Defendant-Appellant Tari M. Ewing (Defendant) was orally charged with Prohibited Noise in violation of the Revised Ordinances of Honolulu (ROH) § 41-31.1 (1995), 1 commonly known as the “Boom Box Law.” Following a bench trial, the trial court found Defendant guilty as charged, and judgment was entered on August 11,1993. We affirm.
The following evidence was adduced. On May 23, 1993 at around 4:30 p.m., Officer Edwin Letarte (Officer Letarte) of the Honolulu Police Department was on duty in a supermarket parking lot located “at the intersection of Kailua Road and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. MallanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. SturchHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
- Nielsen v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
- HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Kepo'o v. WatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.