Legal Opinion

Kepo'o v. Watson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1998No. 18508PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants Kawa-ihae Cogeneration Partners (KCP) and Wai-mana Enterprises, Inc. (Waimana) (collectively KCP/Waimana) filed an interlocutory appeal from the order granting partial summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appel-lees Arthur F. Kepo'o, Lillian K. Déla Cruz, and Josephine L. Tanimoto (collectively Plaintiffs). We affirm the circuit courts order. However, because this is an interlocutory appeal and factual determinations have not yet been made by the circuit court, the case must be remanded for further proceedings.

I. BACKGROUND

In early 1993,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keaukaha-Panaewa Community Association v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Aguiar v. Hawaii Housing AuthorityHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Price v. Obayashi Hawaii Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ahuna v. Department of Hawaiian Home LandsHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Keaukaha-Panaewa Community Ass'n v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kahala Royal Corp. v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. George Young, Jr. v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Keahole Defense Coalition, Inc. v. Board of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kepo'o v. KaneHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API