Legal Opinion
State v. Sturch
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided June 27, 1996No. 16778PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ACOBA, Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Jimmy W. Sturch (Defendant) was found guilty by the district court of four charges of violating Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291C-112 (1993) which prohibits inhabiting a parked vehicle between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. The court imposed a $25 fine for each conviction, but suspended the fines imposed on the last three charges on the condition that Defendant not receive similar citations for a period of one month. We affirm.
I
HRS § 291C-112 states as follows:
§ 291C-112 Certain uses of parked vehicles prohibited between 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.;…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- James S. Joel v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Formaro v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- State v. GuidryHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- Occupy Columbia v. HaleyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- State v. BeltranHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.