Legal Opinion

McCandless v. Schick

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1963No. 9088PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Respondents, B. W. McCandless and wife, as purchasers, instituted this action against appellant Schick and wife, as sellers, specifically to enforce an alleged agreement of sale of real property or in lieu thereof for damages.

In May, 1960, the Schicks listed with one Ralph Assendrup, a licensed real estate broker, their 61 acre farm property for sale at the price of $42,500.00. Assendrup contacted the McCandless’s, who on June 14, 1960, made an offer to purchase the property for $34,000.00. This offer prepared by Assendrup was contained in a printed form of “Receipt and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Wormward v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Houser v. HobartIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Harvey v. Fearless Farris Wholesale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. General Auto Parts Co. v. Genuine Parts Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Glenn v. GotzingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API