Legal Opinion

State v. Kysar

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1989No. 17220PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

Defendant David Kysar entered a conditional plea of guilty to a charge of robbery pursuant to I.C.R. 11(a)(2), reserving the right to review certain adverse pretrial rulings. Kysar appeals the trial court’s denial of separate motions to suppress evidence and to dismiss the information for failure to hold a speedy trial. Kysar also appeals his sentence. We affirm.

I

SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE

First we address Kysar’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Kysar asserts that the police had no probable cause to arrest him, that the arrest and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. HigginsIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. TrevinoIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. ButiIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. MartinezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API