Legal Opinion
Angleton v. Angleton
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1962No. 8899PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNUDSON, Justice.
The appellant, Ludmilla Waskowsky Angleton, and respondent, Hugh R. Angle-ton, intermarried on September 11, 1948. One male child, Peter John, was born November 13, 1955, the sole issue of said marriage.
The controversy between these parties was initially brought to the attention of the trial court in a habeas corpus action, being, post, 201, 370 P.2d 798, commenced by appellant to secure custody of the child. Pending the hearing in the habeas corpus proceedings respondent filed an action seeking a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty, and custody of the minor child.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. FornessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Petterson Lighterage & T. Corp. v. New York Central R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Gapsch v. GapschIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Limited, of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Western Pac R.R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co. Metzger v. Western Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Avondale on Hayden, Inc. v. HallIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mitchell v. FlandroIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Loveland v. LovelandIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.