Legal Opinion

Conner v. Plank

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1914No. Civ. No. 1460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff. The findings of fact in this ease state that on September 8, 1911, the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant Mary D. Plank whereby the defendant agreed to pay to plaintiff one-half of certain moneys theretofore received by her from F. W. Partridge, and also to pay to plaintiff on the distribution of the estate of said Partridge deceased, one-half of the net value of said estate as the same should be distributed to her; that in consideration of said agreement on the part of defendant, the plaintiff agreed to obtain forthwith an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Las Palmas Winery & Distillery v. Garrett & Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Pacific Rolling Mill Co. v. Riverside & Arlington Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Toms v. HellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Nolte v. Southern California Home Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Calumet Refining Co. v. Star Lubricating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API