Brooks Bros. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Re, Judge:
The legal question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from England and described on the invoice as “The Economist Diary — 1966.” The merchandise was classified by the customs officials under item 256.56 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as “Blank books, bound: Diaries * * and was consequently assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem. Since the item of the tariff schedules, pursuant to which the merchandise was assessed, in addition to diaries also covers “notebooks, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Nomura (America) Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Nomura (America) Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Mead Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- The Mead Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Mead Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998