Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIDGWAY, Judge.
At issue in this case is the proper tariff classification of certain adjustable mechanical pipettes — known as “Pipetman” pipettes — which were imported from France through the port of Boston in 1999 by Plaintiff Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. (“Rai-nin”). Rainin challenges the decision of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) 1 denying its protest and classifying the pipettes as “[mjachines and mechanical appliances having individual functions,” under subheading 8479.89.97 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) (1999). 2 Duties were…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Processed Plastic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- ABB, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Wagner Spray Tech Corp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007