Legal Opinion

Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 24, 2003No. 00-11-00514PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge.

At issue in this case is the proper tariff classification of certain adjustable mechanical pipettes — known as “Pipetman” pipettes — which were imported from France through the port of Boston in 1999 by Plaintiff Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. (“Rai-nin”). Rainin challenges the decision of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) 1 denying its protest and classifying the pipettes as “[mjachines and mechanical appliances having individual functions,” under subheading 8479.89.97 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) (1999). 2 Duties were…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  2. Processed Plastic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  3. ABB, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  4. Wagner Spray Tech Corp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API