Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Brudnock

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1986No. 17911-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff insurance company brought a declaratory judgment action to determine its responsibility on a claim submitted under an automobile insurance policy issued to the defendant Janet Brudnock. The parties submitted the case to the superior court on a stipulated set of facts and filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted judgment in favor of the insurance company, finding it had no liability under the policy for the claim. The Court of Appeals affirmed in a memorandum decision. State Farm v. Brudnock, 1 CA-CIV 7572, filed Dec. 6, 1984. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Balestrieri v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lawrence v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Kraft v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Harsha v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Drage v. MantifelOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrudnockArizona Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API