Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Stevens

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 18, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 90-0095PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether a motorist, who has no automobile liability insurance at the time of an accident, becomes insured so as to preclude recovery under the uninsured motorist provision of the plaintiff’s policy, when a joint tortfeasor settles with the plaintiff in an amount equal to or in excess of the requirements of the Financial Responsibility Act.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

On September 28, 1985, Steven Parker (Parker), a minor, was allegedly drag rac ing with another motorist when the other motorist hit the Stevens car. Glen Stevens was seriously injured and his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Filasky v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Voland v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Manterola v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Hamill v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API