Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Brudnock

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1986No. 17911-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

151 Ariz. 268 (1986)

727 P.2d 321

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Janet M. BRUDNOCK and Steve Harrigan, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 17911-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

October 17, 1986.

Hofmann, Salcito, Stevens & Myers by Gene C. Stevens, Frank Verderame, Phoenix, for plaintiff-appellee.

Rosen & Schneider by David Neal Rosen, Barry J. Klinckhardt, Robert A. Resnik, Phoenix, for defendants-appellants.

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff insurance company brought a declaratory judgment action to determine its responsibility on a claim submitted under an…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Brown v. Progressive Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. Hosogai v. KadotaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Balestrieri v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API