Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1982No. 16059-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

On 3 January 1980, a summary judgment was granted in favor of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in an action to recover for injuries suffered in an automobile accident. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 133 Ariz. 483, 652 P.2d 556 (1982). Paul Anderson and Dusty Ellington, plaintiffs below, filed a petition for review by this court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

We must answer only one question: Does an automobile collision which occurs when a hit-and-run driver propels a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Allied Fidelity Ins. Co. v. LambIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. In re the Arbitration between SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. Progressive Classic Insurance v. BlaudCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. ArnoldKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrudnockArizona Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API