Legal Opinion
LTX Corp. v. Daewoo Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 16, 1997No. CIV.A. 96-11278-GAOPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
O’TOOLE, District Judge.
The defendants, Daewoo Corporation (“Daewoo Corp.”) and Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Daewoo Electronics”), have moved to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) for lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient service of process or, in the alternative, to dismiss on grounds of forum non conveniens. For the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted.
I. Plaintiffs Claims
The plaintiff, LTX Corporation (“LTX”), is a Massachusetts corporation that manufactures and sells semiconductor testing equipment worldwide.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Lupron Marketing and Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Fern v. ImmergutMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Gianocostas v. Interface Group-Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Bistany v. PNC BANK, NADistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Gianocostas v. Riu Hotels, S.A.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.