Legal Opinion
Fern v. Immergut
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided August 15, 2002No. 98-P-2338PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuefly, J.
The remaining partners of a five-member Massachusetts law firm, Fern, Anderson, Donahue, Jones & Sabatt, P.A. (Fern), seek indemnification or contribution from a New York law firm, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy (Milbank). Fern had previously settled a claim against it made by Mil-bank’s New York client, Kansallis Finance, Ltd. (Kansallis), a Finnish corporation with a New York office. In the complaint before us, Fern alleges that Milbank was negligent in its representation of Kansallis. Fern appeals from the dismissal of this complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We conclude that the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Weinberg v. Grand Circle Travel, LCCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Cepeda v. KassMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Von SCHönau-Riedweg v. Rothschild Bank AGMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- REMF Corp. v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- LaForest v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.