Legal Opinion

State v. Gilmour

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 6, 1997No. CM95-21824; CA A95759PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for resisting arrest, ORS 162.315, and providing liquor to a person under 21, ORS 471.408. Although he was charged with a number of crimes, the jury acquitted him of all of the charges except the two above-mentioned convictions. Those convictions were entered as misdemeanors rather than violations.

Defendant argues that the trial court erred in entering the convictions as misdemeanors because the state did not indicate on the record that it intended to proceed with those two charges as misdemeanors, as required by ORS 161.565(2). The state concedes that it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. LovetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. BonninCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. GilmourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API