Legal Opinion

State v. Lovette

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 1996No. 11-94-08747; CA A88942PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, and harassment, ORS 166.065, assigning error to the court’s treatment of those charges as misdemeanors rather than violations. We affirm.

The issue in this case is the same as that addressed in State v. Bonnin, 144 Or App 263, 926 P2d 830 (1996): whether the state satisfied the requirements of ORS 161.565(2) in order to proceed with the charged offenses as misdemeanors. Defendant asserts that it did not, and that the trial court consequently erred by allowing both offenses to be prosecuted as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BonninCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SennCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. GilmourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API