Norwalk v. Van Dyke
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
The essential facts, as presented to the trial court by admissions in the pleadings and by uncontroverted affidavits and documents admitted in support of a motion for summary judgment, are as follows: The defendant, who was employed by the plaintiff city of Norwalk as a guidance counselor, was injured in the course of her employment as a result of the negligence of a third party. A voluntary written agreement providing for workmen's compensation was entered into and was approved by the commissioner. Under this agreement, the plaintiff employer paid to or in behalf of the defendant the sum of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Demartino v. SiemonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Berlinski v. OvelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Rosenbaum v. Hartford News Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Ciarleglio v. Benedict Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Olszewski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Skitromo v. Meriden Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Misiurka v. Maple Hill Farms, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Johndrow v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Libby v. Goodwin Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Reichert v. SheridanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.