Legal Opinion

Berlinski v. Ovellette

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 21, 1973PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs rendered following a trial to the court of an automobile negligence action. The judgment awarded damages to the named plaintiff for personal injuries and to his father for property damage to the latter’s automobile. The parties stipulated to the facts and confined the sole issue on the appeal to the validity and effect of a so-called trust agreement entered into between Frank S. Berlinski, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, and Allstate Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as Allstate.

The stipulated facts may be briefly…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Marks v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. City of New York Insurance v. TiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Bodner v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Roy v. Centennial InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  5. Westchester Fire Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API