Legal Opinion

Hastings & Heyden Realty Co. v. Gest

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 6, 1921No. 9889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action to quiet title to water right. Findings and decree for defendants. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Julian H. Moore, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Plaintiff brought action to quiet title to a certain water right as appurtenant to the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section 35, township 3 south, range 67 west, owned by it, to restrain the defendant Gest and the Irrigation Company from diverting this water to other land, and for general relief. Findings and decree were for defendants, which plaintiff brings here .for review.

It appears that Gest and others associated with him, were owners of the southwest quarter of section 35, township 3 south, range 67 west, and that in January, 1911, they conveyed the land to one Gallup by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arnett v. LinhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Bessemer Irrigating Ditch Co. v. WoolleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  3. Travelers Insurance v. ChildsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  4. King v. AckroydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  5. Huff v. FarwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Bayou Land Co. v. TalleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Kinoshita v. North Denver BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Matter of Estate of PalizziSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. State v. LionelloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API