Matter of Estate of Palizzi
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
This is a will contest which centers on whether the testator’s devise of farm land also included water rights. Margaret M. Palizzi, the personal representative of the Estate of Carl A. Palizzi (the petitioner), filed an action against Tom Palizzi, the personal representative of the Estate of Anthony Palizzi, Jr. (the respondent). The Adams County District Court determined that the water rights were appurtenant to the land, were devised by implication to the petitioner, and therefore issued a permanent injunction prohibiting the respondent from interfering in the use of the water rights. On…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Arnett v. LinhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Meier v. Denver United States National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Twin Lakes Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Bessemer Irrigating Ditch Co. v. WoolleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Travelers Insurance v. ChildsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ramstetter v. Hostetler (In re Estate of Ramstetter)Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Matter of Estate of SandsteadColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Conradt v. Four Star Promotions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Shigo, LLC v. HockerColorado Court of Appeals · 2014