Legal Opinion

Kinoshita v. North Denver Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 9, 1973No. C-299PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

With respect to opinions of the Court of Appeals of Colorado, C.A.R. 35(f) provides in part as follows:

“Only the opinions officially selected for publication shall be binding upon the trial judges of the state of Colorado and shall be considered as stare decisis for the point of law settled therein; provided, however, they do not conflict with any decisions of the Colorado Supreme Court.”

The Court of Appeals’ opinion under consideration here (Kinoshita v. North Denver Bank, 31 Colo. App. 227, 501 P.2d 1337 (1972)), was officially selected for publication. We granted certiorari, not because we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bessemer Irrigating Ditch Co. v. WoolleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  2. Travelers Insurance v. ChildsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. Denver Joint Stock Land Bank v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  4. Hastings & Heyden Realty Co. v. GestSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. State v. LionelloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bayou Land Co. v. TalleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Matter of Estate of PalizziSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Valley Bank of Frederick v. RoweColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Matter of Estate of PalizziColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Shigo, LLC v. HockerColorado Court of Appeals · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API