Bessemer Irrigating Ditch Co. v. Woolley
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Pueblo County.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
Action to enjoin interference with irrigating ditches and water rights.
The subject-matter of the controversy is the ■Cape Horn Banch Ditch and the Wheel Banch Ditch and their accompanying water rights. The general purpose of the action is twofold: to enjoin.the defendant from using the same, and to quiet plaintiffs’ title, and the complaint contains every allegation that would he necessary in a hill to quiet title to these properties and to enjoin wrongful use of them. The' *440answer alleges possession and ownership in defendant and asks to have the action dismissed. The court quieted title in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Frank v. HicksWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
- Arnett v. LinhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Dean v. DeanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1826
- Travelers Insurance v. ChildsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Twin Lakes Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Lambert v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Denver Joint Stock Land Bank v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Cooper v. ShannonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- City of Denver v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.