Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Linhart

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1895PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goddard

This is an action brought by Mary M. Arnett against Eliza and David Linhart to recover damages resulting from the interruption of the use of an irrigating ditch, and the consequent loss of water for irrigation purposes, and for certain equitable relief.

Upon the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, the court below sustained a motion for nonsuit and dismissed the action at plaintiff’s cost. The assignment of errors challenges the correctness of this ruling. From the record it appears that on the 8th day of April, 1886, defendants conveyed, by warranty deed, to plaintiff a certain piece of land…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bayou Land Co. v. TalleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Harris v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Twin Lakes Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Bessemer Irrigating Ditch Co. v. WoolleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  5. Travelers Insurance v. ChildsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API