Legal Opinion
Kim v. Moffett
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 29, 2010No. 38426-4-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
234 P.3d 279 (2010)
John H. KIM, Min H. Kim and Eugene H. Kim, Appellants,
v.
Frank C. MOFFETT and "Jane Doe" Moffett, husband and wife, and T.A.A., Incorporated, Respondents.
No. 38426-4-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
June 29, 2010.
Douglas Duane Sulkosky, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Appellants.
Paul H. Meyer, Attorney at Law, Olympia, WA, for Respondents.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, J.
¶ 1 Chul Mo Kim contracted with an Olympia architect for professional services to facilitate the development of California properties that were owned at different times by Kim, and then his sons, in various…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Quadrant Corp. v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barbara Knapke v. Peopleconnect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Tacoma Auto Mall, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Hickok-Knight v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Empire Health Found. v. CHS/Community Health Sys. Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2019
- Cymbidium Restoration Trust v. American Homeowner Preservation Trust Series AHP Servicing, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.