Crown Controls, Inc. v. Smiley
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
The issue presented in this case is if the "election of remedies" doctrine should be applied when an agent fails to adequately disclose the identity of the principal on whose behalf he is contracting. This court has previously held that in such circumstances, a creditor must elect whether it will seek to hold the agent or the principal liable for the debt. Under prior law, a judgment received against one discharges the other from liability, as long as the creditor has already learned of the existence and identity of the previously undisclosed principal. However, this "election of remedies"…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Stranger CreekWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Glover v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Barber v. RochesterWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re the Personal Restraint of MercerWashington Supreme Court · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Illinois Controls, Inc. v. LanghamOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Besel v. Viking InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Besel v. Viking Ins. Co. of WisconsinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Dan Paulson Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.